My
name is Zahidur Rahman. My research interests are in the area of satellite
remote sensing and the application of NOAA environmental satellite data, which
include climate and weather impact on ecosystems, vector borne diseases
systems, environmental hazards, error correction of NOAA/GOES environmental
satellite data, and solar and wind energy. In the past six years, I have
published several research papers in the area of satellite remote sensing.
Currently, I am a registered Professional Engineer (PE) in the states of New
York and Michigan. I enjoy teaching math, statistics, and engineering courses.
As
an engineering faculty member, I teach electrical circuits course that is
required for all engineering students (electrical, civil, and mechanical). The
concept of electrical circuit theory is abstract and can be hard to grasp for some
students. This course is a three credit course based on traditional lectures,
class notes, and tutorials. The traditional teaching method in this course
mainly focuses on problem solving through circuit diagrams with a few defined
electrical quantities (voltage and current) identified on the circuit. Even the
simplest of circuits contains a wealth of information that goes unseen by the
student. Only a few of the values in a circuit are ever calculated in class or in
their homework. The focus of the students’ concentration is directed to one
element or value at a time. Information about other values is often neither
shown nor seen. The limited visibility of the circuit voltages and currents
seems natural to engineering students because instrumentation—voltmeters,
ohmmeters, oscilloscopes—typically show only one value at a time. Based on my
teaching experience, I also observed that most of the engineering students find difficulties in problem solving (e.g. identifying problems, presenting topics,
analyzing problems, attempting problem solutions, responding to problems,
thinking carefully, or evaluating alternatives) in their electrical circuit
course. Students solve their problems by hand calculation but they may be
unable to find an exact solution and cannot verify whether their solution is
correct or incorrect. Students need to use computer simulation
software or a real lab to visualize their problem and verify their solutions so
that they can be assured that their solutions are correct. Therefore, I choose to teach electrical circuits course using Multisim simulation software as a DH
simulations/ Model tools to schematically
represent electric circuit problems. I hypothesize that using Multisim to solve
and verify electric circuit problems that require computer simulation and
visualization will increase student’s understanding of electrical circuit
theories and concepts.
I think two cultures ( humanities and science/math) play an important role in undergraduate engineering. Yes, I see a ‘tension’ in our engineering students who come to us for advisement.
As an engineering faculty member, I provide
advisement/guidance to engineering
students on course selection, transferring
and summer internships. The students always ask me why engineering
students need to study humanities. When I ask what the problem is, they say that
they came to LaGuardia for engineering. They
don’t see the point of reading all this old impractical stuff that has nothing
to do with their careers. When I ask them to guess why LaGuardia requires these
courses of them, someone usually says, smirking, ‘I don’t know’.
I usually tell
students about my personal experiences of taking humanities classes during the
course of my undergraduate study. My school (Bangladesh University of
Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh)
required Humanities credits to graduate. This was a mandatory course
that every sophomore had to take. I remember before our first lecture I could hear students complaining that it was a waste of time to
learn all this irrelevant information – we didn’t have the time for this
course. How could Engineering students use art or music or urban
sociology? But before long we looked forward to each lecture. We
were learning that any advance in one area affected society as a
whole. Advances in chemistry led to better paints, advances in
building materials changed architectural designs. The most important
thing I learned from that course is that life is interconnected. I’m so
very grateful that these courses were mandatory, and that every sophomore
attended the lectures together. Because there are so many different people,
such as architects, artists, engineers, writers, or politicians, and we
each have something to learn from others.
My personal
communication with students gave me the impression that they enjoyed learning
about fields other than their own. I think students will realize when they work
with other people why studying humanities is very important for their life
experiences.
Thank you for the thoughtful post. When I teach Technical Writing, I remind my (engineering) students that many studies show that oral and written communication is critical to long-term growth and success in engineering and scientific careers. (You can even find citations on this -- for instance, it has been well documented at AT&T/Bell Labs over the years.) Maybe visualizations and simulations from the digital humanities could be a 'hook' to grab the attention of engineering students -- as you suggest, they are already using simulations in their work for their classes in their major.
ReplyDeleteYes, This is a great idea. I will do that. Thank you for giving to me this information.
DeleteThanks for sharing your experience with mandatory humanities courses. It sounds like a great experience. I took a Humanities core course that was so interesting too, in college.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Jennifer
Delete"Life is interconnected" - that is such an important understanding to transmit to our students. I am pleased that this understanding will be reinforced across the curriculum now that the college has approved the new "integrative learning" core competency.
ReplyDelete